linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add function graph tracer support for ARM (resend)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:17:08 +0100
From:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To:	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Cc:	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add function graph tracer support for ARM (resend)

Tim Bird wrote:
> The use of "already_here" works around trace entry nesting
> (I believe due to instrumentation of either cpu_clock or
> raw_smp_processor_id).  Advice on the best way to deal
> with this would be appreciated.  (that is, whether
> to use the guard variable, or just un-instrument the
> offending routines).

I think it's better to keep functions instrumented where possible, if
checking for context isn't too expensive.  Sometimes it's interesting
to see how many times they are called.

But it's not much use instrumenting those functions if activity on a
different CPU suppresses it.  Is there no way to make "already_here"
task/CPU specific?

What do other architectures do?  Consistency is good.

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/