[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904231225.01618.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:25:01 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hcegtvedt@...el.com, vapier@...too.org, rongkai.zhan@...driver.com,
balajirrao@...nmoko.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with irqs enabled
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:02:48 -0700
> David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
>
> > > as I stated in the email to Andrew.
> > >
> > > do you agree? :)
> >
> > If (rtc_update_irq() starts disabling them locally,
> > && its interface stops requiring callers to do that)
> > then
> > it's fine;
> >
>
> but why rtc_update_irq should disable the IRQs? I believe
> it can work just fine with IRQs enabled.
The last patch I saw was just changing from "caller must
disable them" to "rtc_update_irq() disables them".
If you're talking about a different patch, please forward...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists