[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090423212639.7ba7cb0b@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:26:39 +0200
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hcegtvedt@...el.com, vapier@...too.org, rongkai.zhan@...driver.com,
balajirrao@...nmoko.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with
irqs enabled
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:25:01 -0700
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> > but why rtc_update_irq should disable the IRQs? I believe
> > it can work just fine with IRQs enabled.
>
> The last patch I saw was just changing from "caller must
> disable them" to "rtc_update_irq() disables them".
>
> If you're talking about a different patch, please forward...
no patch, just theory.
the question is, do we need IRQs disabled when
calling rtc_update_irq?
and if yes, why? to prevent what?
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists