linux-kernel - RFC about Comedi on a patch that remove a lot fo code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <63a49ef40904240228g6a28ba8dsf63d2e0bdc6b57d9@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:28:28 +0200
From:	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>
To:	Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
	Frank Mori Hess <fmhess@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	David Schleef <ds@...leef.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Comedi-ml <comedi_list@...glegroups.com>
Subject: RFC about Comedi on a patch that remove a lot fo code

Dear Comedi developers,

Sorry for my bad english.

I would be happy to receive your considerations about that patch:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=123792129500760&w=2

I know that some users use Comedi on dual kernel approach systems.
Obviously I don't have any against this but i think that Linux git
tree isn't the right place to support those software (RTAI, Xenomai,
RTLinux and others). Those projects already released patches against
Linux source code so it very easy for them add also patch for Comedi
drivers in the same tarball.

At the already listed 8 reasons  in that email I want added a ninth one:
9) Give more chance for interested developers to fix it against RT_PREEMPT
http://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-users&m=124049407712792&w=2

Thanks!

Ciao,
Alessio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/