[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090424225122.GB3343@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:51:22 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>
Cc: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
Frank Mori Hess <fmhess@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
David Schleef <ds@...leef.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Comedi-ml <comedi_list@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: RFC about Comedi on a patch that remove a lot fo code
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:28:28AM +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Dear Comedi developers,
>
> Sorry for my bad english.
>
> I would be happy to receive your considerations about that patch:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=123792129500760&w=2
>
> I know that some users use Comedi on dual kernel approach systems.
> Obviously I don't have any against this but i think that Linux git
> tree isn't the right place to support those software (RTAI, Xenomai,
> RTLinux and others). Those projects already released patches against
> Linux source code so it very easy for them add also patch for Comedi
> drivers in the same tarball.
>
> At the already listed 8 reasons in that email I want added a ninth one:
> 9) Give more chance for interested developers to fix it against RT_PREEMPT
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-users&m=124049407712792&w=2
I am siding with you, and agree all of the RT stuff should be deleted
from the in-kernel comedi code, as there is on in-kernel users of it.
Also, the recent Linux RT changes will not need any of these
driver-specific changes at all from what I can tell, so they are now
obsolete.
Frank, unless you have any major objections, I'd like to remove this
code.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists