[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090425.020612.92585418.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:06:12 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, david-b@...bell.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hcegtvedt@...el.com, vapier@...too.org, rongkai.zhan@...driver.com,
balajirrao@...nmoko.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with
irqs enabled
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:48:50 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> Here is a possible example:
>
> 1. RTC alarm interrupt handler takes rtc->irq_lock by spin_lock()
> 2. A timer interrupt handler calls rtc_uie_timer() for UIE emulation
> 3. rtc_uie_timer() waits on rtc->irq_lock .... deadlock!
Oops, this is wrong. This deadlock cannot happen since
rtc_uie_timer() will be called in bh (softirq) context, not interrupt
context.
Anyway, I just posted updated patch. Please take a look. Thanks.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists