[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090424214117.76bc3dda@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:41:17 +0200
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, david-b@...bell.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hcegtvedt@...el.com, vapier@...too.org, rongkai.zhan@...driver.com,
balajirrao@...nmoko.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with
irqs enabled
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:06:12 +0900 (JST)
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> RTC alarm interrupt handler takes rtc->irq_lock by spin_lock()
> > 2. A timer interrupt handler calls rtc_uie_timer() for UIE emulation
> > 3. rtc_uie_timer() waits on rtc->irq_lock .... deadlock!
>
> Oops, this is wrong. This deadlock cannot happen since
> rtc_uie_timer() will be called in bh (softirq) context, not interrupt
> context.
Correct.
And we have only one irq handler per driver. Anything else?
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists