[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F65016F6CB04E49BFFA15D4F7B798D9988D0041@orsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:57:34 -0700
From: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@...el.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"chrisw@...s-sol.org" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"jbeulich@...ell.com" <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
"peterm@...hat.com" <peterm@...hat.com>,
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@...el.com>,
"Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@...el.com>,
"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC v2][PATCH 1/1] intel_txt: Intel(R) TXT and tboot kernel
support
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:andi@...stfloor.org]
> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 3:03 AM
>
> Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@...el.com> writes:
>
> Quick review.
>
> Overall it doesn't seem too bad and looks clean and reasonable
> overall, but some details probably need to be fixed.
>
> > diff -uprN ../linux.trees.git/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig
> ./arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig
> > --- ../linux.trees.git/arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig 2009-03-29 12:12:13.000000000 -
> 0700
> > +++ ./arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig 2009-03-30 13:03:26.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ CONFIG_X86_BIOS_REBOOT=y
> > CONFIG_X86_TRAMPOLINE=y
> > CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR=y
> > CONFIG_DEFCONFIG_LIST="/lib/modules/$UNAME_RELEASE/.config"
> > +# CONFIG_INTEL_TXT is not set
>
> Normally random patches shouldn't update defconfigs, maintainers do that.
> Just drop these hunks.
Will do.
> > # General setup
> > diff -uprN ../linux.trees.git/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h
> > --- ../linux.trees.git/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h 2009-03-29 12:12:13.000000000 -
> 0700
> > +++ ./arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam.h 2009-03-30 13:03:25.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct setup_header {
> > __u32 payload_offset;
> > __u32 payload_length;
> > __u64 setup_data;
> > + __u32 tboot_shared_addr;
> > } __attribute__((packed));
>
> These changes should be documented in Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt
Per Peter Anvin's advice, this field will move to struct boot_params (and changed to be 64b) and we will doc it in zero-page.txt.
> > +/* GAS - Generic Address Structure (ACPI 2.0+) */
> > +struct tboot_acpi_generic_address {
> > + u8 space_id;
> > + u8 bit_width;
> > + u8 bit_offset;
> > + u8 access_width;
> > + u64 address;
> > +} __attribute__ ((__packed__));
>
> Why not use the existing structure from ACPI?
This is the ACPI structure, but just not the Linux type definition of it. This is because tboot needs to work with multiple target kernels/VMMs and so it must define its parameters "independently".
> > +struct tboot_acpi_sleep_info {
> > + struct tboot_acpi_generic_address pm1a_cnt_blk;
> > + struct tboot_acpi_generic_address pm1b_cnt_blk;
> > + struct tboot_acpi_generic_address pm1a_evt_blk;
> > + struct tboot_acpi_generic_address pm1b_evt_blk;
> > + u16 pm1a_cnt_val;
> > + u16 pm1b_cnt_val;
> > + u64 wakeup_vector;
>
> So that vector can be >4GB but the tshared data structure not?
Neither can currently be 64b in practice, though now both types will be 64b to allow for future "expansion".
> > + u32 vector_width;
> > + u64 kernel_s3_resume_vector;
> > +} __attribute__ ((__packed__));
>
> In general it might be better to put ACPI defined structures somewhere
> in the acpi includes, separated from Linux defined types.
Per above, tboot needs to define its interface independently of any specific kernel or VMM.
> A reference to the spec in a comment would be also useful.
OK.
> > +struct tboot_shared {
> > + /* version 3+ fields: */
> > + struct tboot_uuid uuid; /* TBOOT_SHARED_UUID */
> > + u32 version; /* Version number: 5 is current */
> > + u32 log_addr; /* physical addr of tb_log_t log */
> > + u32 shutdown_entry; /* entry point for tboot shutdown */
> > + u32 shutdown_type; /* type of shutdown (TB_SHUTDOWN_*) */
> > + struct tboot_acpi_sleep_info
> > + acpi_sinfo; /* where kernel put acpi sleep info in Sx */
> > + u32 tboot_base; /* starting addr for tboot */
> > + u32 tboot_size; /* size of tboot */
> > + u8 num_mac_regions; /* number mem regions to MAC on S3 */
> > + /* contig regions memory to MAC on S3 */
> > + struct tboot_mac_region mac_regions[MAX_TB_MAC_REGIONS];
> > + /* version 4+ fields: */
> > + /* populated by tboot; will be encrypted */
> > + u8 s3_key[TB_KEY_SIZE];
> > + /* version 5+ fields: */
> > + u8 reserved_align[3]; /* used to 4byte-align num_in_wfs */
> > + u32 num_in_wfs; /* number of processors in wait-for-SIPI */
>
> You could use __attribute__ aligned instead
I prefer to keep the padding explicit, for wider compiler compatibility as well as for potential later use.
> > *((unsigned short *)__va(0x472)) = reboot_mode;
> >
> > @@ -500,11 +504,17 @@ static void native_machine_emergency_res
> >
> > void native_machine_shutdown(void)
> > {
> > - /* Stop the cpus and apics */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > -
> > /* The boot cpu is always logical cpu 0 */
> > int reboot_cpu_id = 0;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + /* TXT requires VMX to be off for all shutdowns */
> > + if (tboot_in_measured_env())
> > + emergency_vmx_disable_all();
>
> I thought KVM did that already in its shutdown handler? Why is this needed again?
It does in most shutdown cases, but not for reboot.
> > +#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> > +#include <asm/processor.h>
> > +#include <asm/bootparam.h>
> > +#include <asm/setup.h>
> > +#include <asm/io.h>
> > +#include <asm/tboot.h>
> > +
> > +/* Global pointer to shared data; NULL means no measured launch. */
> > +struct tboot_shared *tboot_shared;
>
> Should be __read_mostly probably
Will change.
> > +
> > +static spinlock_t pgtable_lock;
>
> Locks should have comments describing what they protect and possibly
> required locking order if applicable.
Will be removed (see below).
> Also should be using DEFINE_SPINLOCK (or maybe DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK,
> are all these contexts lockdep safe?)
Ditto on removal.
> > +void __init tboot_probe(void)
> > +{
> > + /* Look for valid page-aligned address for shared page. */
> > + if (boot_params.hdr.tboot_shared_addr == 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* Map and check for tboot UUID. */
> > + set_fixmap(FIX_TBOOT_SHARED_BASE, boot_params.hdr.tboot_shared_addr);
>
> I would do a quick check here if this actually points to something
> in the e820 map. Just to be paranoid and avoid crashes for junk input
> data.
Will do.
> > + tboot_shared = NULL;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (tboot_shared->version < 5) {
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "tboot_shared version is invalid: %u\n",
> > + tboot_shared->version);
>
> This would likely benefit from a more instructive prefix that points what
> wentg wrong. TXT: ? "Measured-launch:"? TBOOT: ? Similar for other messages.
Will do.
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_lock_init(&pgtable_lock);
>
> Ok drop that and use DEFINE_*_SPINLOCK
Will be removed per below.
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "TBOOT: found shared page at phys addr 0x%lx:\n",
> > + (unsigned long)boot_params.hdr.tboot_shared_addr);
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG " version: %d\n", tboot_shared->version);
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG " log_addr: 0x%08x\n", tboot_shared->log_addr);
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG " shutdown_entry: 0x%x\n",
> > + tboot_shared->shutdown_entry);
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG " tboot_base: 0x%08x\n", tboot_shared->tboot_base);
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG " tboot_size: 0x%x\n", tboot_shared->tboot_size);
> > +}
>
> Seem to be a lot more dependencies on all this stuff being < 4GB. Was that intended?
Yes--Intel TXT components (SINIT, MLE, config space, etc.) are defined to be <4GB.
> > +static pgd_t *tboot_pg_dir;
> > +static u32 map_base, map_size;
> > +static struct mm_struct tboot_mm = INIT_MM(tboot_mm);
> > +
> > +static inline void switch_to_tboot_pt(void)
> > +{
> > + wbinvd();
>
> Is the wbinvd really needed? If yes there should be a comment.
It was needed to ensure that all of the page table creation writes were getting flushed before paging got disabled by tboot. Without it we were getting a PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC warning. I will add a comment to this effect.
> > + native_write_cr3(virt_to_phys(tboot_pg_dir));
>
> This means it explodes with paravirt, right? Do you have a check early
> for that?
This code will only be executed if the tboot_shared page is found, which should not be the case if the kernel is running paravirtualized. But I will change it to just write_cr3() to be more consistent with other cases where we don't try to specifically exclude paravirt hooks.
> > +static void clean_up_tboot_mapping(void)
> > +{
> > + pgd_t *pgd;
> > + pud_t *pud;
> > + pmd_t *pmd;
> > + pte_t *pte;
> > + unsigned long vaddr, i, j;
> > +
> > + if (!tboot_in_measured_env())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* The following loop is to release the pages allocated for building
> > + * tboot page table. It releases pte pages, then pmd pages, then pud
> > + * pages and finally the pgd page by using variable i to control
> > + * the process, where
> > + * i = 0 denotes to release pte,
> > + * i = 1 denotes to release pmd,
> > + * i = 2 denotes to release pud,
> > + * and i > 2 denotes to release pgd
> > + */
> > + i = 0;
> > + while (tboot_pg_dir) {
> > + for (j = 0, vaddr = map_base << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + j < map_size;
> > + j++, vaddr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > + if (i > 2) {
> > + if (tboot_pg_dir)
> > + pgd_free(&tboot_mm, tboot_pg_dir);
>
> pgd_free() does a lot of things, some of them likely specific to user mappings.
> Have you checked if that is all ok?
This is being removed; see below.
> > + tboot_pg_dir = 0;
> > + break;
> > + } else {
> > + pgd = pgd_offset(&tboot_mm, vaddr);
> > + if ((!pgd) || (!pgd_present(*pgd)))
>
> The NULL checks here and below are all not needed. *_offset never returns NULL.
Removed.
> > +
> > + /* release pte */
> > + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, 0);
>
> So you assume the pte is in lowmem here..
See below for change to allocation (and removal of de-allocation).
> > + if (pte)
> > + pte_free_kernel(&tboot_mm, pte);
> > + pmd_clear(pmd);
> > + }
> > + i++;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int map_page_for_tboot(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pfn,
> > + pgprot_t prot)
> > +{
> > + pgd_t *pgd;
> > + pud_t *pud;
> > + pmd_t *pmd;
> > + pte_t *pte;
> > +
> > + pgd = pgd_offset(&tboot_mm, vaddr);
> > + pud = pud_alloc(&tboot_mm, pgd, vaddr);
> > + if (!pud)
> > + return -1;
> > + pmd = pmd_alloc(&tboot_mm, pud, vaddr);
> > + if (!pmd)
> > + return -1;
> > + pte = pte_alloc_map(&tboot_mm, pmd, vaddr);
> > + if (!pte)
> > + return -1;
>
> ... but not here. That seems inconsistent and might cause crashes with highpte on 32bit.
> better to make sure none of them are in highmem.
See below for change to allocation (and removal of de-allocation).
> > + set_pte_at(&tboot_mm, vaddr, pte, pfn_pte(pfn, prot));
> > + pte_unmap(pte);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int map_pages_for_tboot(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long start_pfn,
> > + unsigned long nr)
> > +{
> > + /* Reuse the original kernel mapping */
> > + tboot_pg_dir = pgd_alloc(&tboot_mm);
>
> That puts the PGD into the pgd_list and then pageattr.c will actually
> walk that list and change ptes, assuming it's a standard kernel
> mapping. Can you tolerate that? It seems dangerous. Better to use
> a pgd_alloc_kernel(). There's none, but you could add one.
>
from a followup email of Andi's:
> Thought some more about this. I think you're ok on 64bit at least
> because the kernel mappings are elsewhere from the identity map and
> keeping them in sync with pageattr makes sense and avoids illegal
> cache attribute aliases.
>
> But on 32bit it could be potentially a problem in general. e.g.
> what happens when the tboot shared page is in the area the kernel
> is running? You would crash during the window where you run
> in that pgd.
>
> It would be probably safer to use a low memory trampoline supplied
> by the kernel too that then loads the new pgd.
I don't think that I understand the issue. The tboot physical addr range will always be <4GB and thus will it's virtual 1:1 mapping. Immediately after switching to this pgd the CPU calls into tboot which will then disable paging and do its thing. Can you elaborate on what the exact issue would be?
> > +#include "acpi/realmode/wakeup.h"
> > +#include <asm/trampoline.h>
> > +
> > +void tboot_shutdown(u32 shutdown_type)
> > +{
> > + if (!tboot_in_measured_env())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* only create the table once */
> > + spin_lock(&pgtable_lock);
> > + if (!tboot_pg_dir) {
> > + /* page alloc routines need interrupts enabled else they */
> > + /* generate debug warnings; we'll disable them afterwards */
> > + local_irq_enable();
>
> Sorry but that doesn't work. It's still not safe to sleep with a spinlock
> and there are other counters e.g. on preempt kernels.
>
> It's probably not too bad in your case because there shouldn't be multiple
> callers of tboot and probably also only in single CPU contexts, but
> all the debugging infrastructure won't like it.
The debug infrastructure is why this was added--we were getting warnings during page table allocation that interrupts were disabled. This cause all shutdown cases to complete without warnings.
But now that you mention it, I think it will be better to create the map during early boot and then we can skip the spinlock, leave interrupts disabled, and skip the free as well.
> So likely you can just drop the spinlock. Perhaps add a WARN_ON() somewhere
> for parallel entry using a simple flag.
Per above, we will allocate early and then don't need the spinlock.
> Also I'm not sure it's a good idea to enable interrupts so deep
> down in shutdown/suspend, it might confuse other code too. Better don't
> do it.
>
>
> > + PFN_UP(WAKEUP_SIZE) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + /* AP trampoline code */
> > + tboot_shared->mac_regions[1].start =
> > + PFN_PHYS(PFN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(trampoline_base)));
> > + tboot_shared->mac_regions[1].size =
> > + PFN_UP(TRAMPOLINE_SIZE) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + /* kernel code + data + bss */
> > + tboot_shared->mac_regions[2].start =
> > + PFN_PHYS(PFN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(&_text)));
> > + tboot_shared->mac_regions[2].size =
> > + PFN_PHYS(PFN_UP(virt_to_phys(&_end))) -
> > + PFN_PHYS(PFN_DOWN(virt_to_phys(&_text)));
> > + }
> > +
> > + tboot_shared->shutdown_type = shutdown_type;
> > +
> > + switch_to_tboot_pt();
>
> What happens with the NMIs? (nmi watchdog etc.) Are they all disabled at this point?
> Machine checks probably too.
The TXT-related code doesn't disable them. Doesn't Linux disable them before shutting down?
> It might be safer to load a special IDT too that just returns.
Tboot will install a minimal IDT but it will handle all interrupts by forcing a reboot.
> > +
> > + ((void(*)(void))(unsigned long)tboot_shared->shutdown_entry)();
> > +
> > + BUG(); /* should not reach here */
>
> The bug will explode because the kernel is gone.
We can probably remove the BUG(), since the call itself can't fail and by the time the tboot code could get into a bad state that caused an un-matched ret, the kernel's page table would be long gone and it would never get back here. But as any execution beyond the call would be catastrophic, it is actually desirable that things blow up rather than fail insecurely--so I'm inclined to leave it or replace it with something equally fatal (?).
> > +}
> > +
> > +void tboot_sleep(u8 sleep_state)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t shutdown_type;
> > +
> > + switch (sleep_state) {
> > + case ACPI_STATE_S3:
> > + shutdown_type = TB_SHUTDOWN_S3;
> > + break;
> > + case ACPI_STATE_S4:
> > + shutdown_type = TB_SHUTDOWN_S4;
> > + break;
> > + case ACPI_STATE_S5:
> > + shutdown_type = TB_SHUTDOWN_S5;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> That's a simple table lookup, could be done much shorter this way.
Changed.
> > +#define TXT_PUB_CONFIG_REGS_BASE 0xfed30000
> > +#define TXT_PRIV_CONFIG_REGS_BASE 0xfed20000
>
> Really no way to discover that?
These are defined as fixed addrs on all TXT platforms.
> > + *(u64 *)(config + TXTCR_HEAP_SIZE));
> > + iounmap(config);
> > + if (heap_base == NULL)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + /* walk heap to SinitMleData */
> > + /* skip BiosData */
> > + heap_ptr = heap_base + *(uint64_t *)heap_base;
>
> Normally using u64. i would add some sanity checks for out of bounds etc.
> Normally it's a good idea to sanity check anything coming from the BIOS.
Changed to u64. This data was already validated by tboot and should not have been altered since then.
> Also isn't this reinventing ACPI table parser code? Perhaps the ACPI code
> could be used directly instead. or is this too early?
This is a copy of the ACPI table that was made during the launch, placed into DMA-protected memory, and validated for correctness. So that is why we want to get it from here.
> > + tbg.access_width = g.access_width; \
> > + tbg.address = g.address;
> > +
> > + if (tboot_in_measured_env()) {
> > + TB_COPY_GAS(tboot_shared->acpi_sinfo.pm1a_cnt_blk,
> > + acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_control_block);
> > + TB_COPY_GAS(tboot_shared->acpi_sinfo.pm1b_cnt_blk,
> > + acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_control_block);
> > + TB_COPY_GAS(tboot_shared->acpi_sinfo.pm1a_evt_blk,
> > + acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block);
> > + TB_COPY_GAS(tboot_shared->acpi_sinfo.pm1b_evt_blk,
> > + acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block);
> > + tboot_shared->acpi_sinfo.pm1a_cnt_val = PM1Acontrol;
> > + tboot_shared->acpi_sinfo.pm1b_cnt_val = PM1Bcontrol;
> > + /* we need phys addr of waking vector, but can't use
> > + virt_to_phys() on &acpi_gbl_FACS because it is ioremap'ed,
> > + so calc from FACS phys addr */
> > + tboot_shared->acpi_sinfo.wakeup_vector = acpi_gbl_FADT.facs +
> > + ((void *)&acpi_gbl_FACS->firmware_waking_vector -
> > + (void *)acpi_gbl_FACS);
>
> That's an opencoded offsetof ?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. But the resulting pointer will get checked for validity in tboot before it is used.
> And you assign the address of the field in the FACS, not the value?
Right--the address is the place that BIOS will look for the resume vector.
> > @@ -404,6 +406,8 @@ int disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> > + /* ensure all CPUs have gone into wait-for-SIPI */
> > + tboot_wait_for_aps(num_cpus);
>
> That looks like something that should be done generically. Wait for
> the other CPUs to be "dead".
The reason for this is because we really need to wait for tboot to put them into VMX mini-guests before we continue. There is enough additional overhead on the call into tboot and then into these guests to require this wait instead of just using the kernel's notion of dead (i.e. when they call into tboot_shutdown()).
> > +config INTEL_TXT
> > + bool "Enable Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology (Intel(R) TXT)"
> > + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && X86
> > + help
> > + This option enables support for booting the kernel with
> > + the Trusted Boot (tboot) module. This will utilize
> > + Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology to perform a
> > + measured launch of the kernel.
>
> One-two sentences here what value a a measured launch brings to the user.
Done.
> > If the system does not
> > + support Intel(R) TXT, this will have no effect.
> > +
> > + See <http://www.intel.com/technology/security/> for more
> > + information about Intel(R) TXT.
> > + And see <http://tboot.sourceforge.net> for more information
> > + about tboot.
> > +
> > + If you are unsure as to whether this is required, answer N.
>
> Putting the howto you had in the intro somewhere in Documentation/*
> and adding a pointer to it here would be a good idea.
OK.
>
> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
Thanks for your comments.
Joe & Shane
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists