[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904271328530.4529@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:30:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.29.1 debugobjects warning
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:00:02 -0400
> > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > ODEBUG: init active object type: timer_list
>
> > It seems to be complaining that cpufreq_governor_dbs() is running
> > init_timer() against a timer which has already been initialised
> > once.
>
> Not just already initialized - but also active. There's these states
> for an object:
>
> ODEBUG_STATE_NONE,
> ODEBUG_STATE_INIT,
> ODEBUG_STATE_INACTIVE,
> ODEBUG_STATE_ACTIVE,
> ODEBUG_STATE_DESTROYED,
>
> So the 'init active object type' warning above suggests that an
> init_timer() has been done on an already running timer. If true then
> that is a bad bug - can corrupt timer state, etc.
>
> Thomas, do you agree?
Yes, that kind of bug makes the timer wheel explode later on due to
list corruption.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists