linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 29/30] microblaze_mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200904271437.09273.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:37:08 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	monstr@...str.eu, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.williams@...alogix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/30] microblaze_mmu_v1: stat.h MMU update

On Monday 27 April 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Why not use __u64/__u32 (and s32/s64 where appropriate)?
> Historical baggage or a techncal reason?

Yes, purely historical reasons: all architectures currently
use the simple C types rather than __u32 in stat.h.

I don't think it makes a difference either way, so I'd
leave it like this unless you find a good reason for
changing.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/