linux-kernel - Re: dm-ioband: Test results.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090427.214421.48516137.ryov@valinux.co.jp>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:44:21 +0900 (JST)
From:	Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>
To:	agk@...hat.com
Cc:	dm-devel@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com, fernando@....ntt.co.jp,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmoyer@...hat.com,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com, nauman@...gle.com,
	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, snitzer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: dm-ioband: Test results.

Hi Alasdair,

From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: dm-ioband: Test results.
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:18:06 -0400

> Why is it that you repeatedly ignore concern/discussion about your
> determination to continue using a custom grouping mechanism?  It is this
> type of excess layering that serves no purpose other than to facilitate
> out-of-tree use-cases.  dm-ioband would take a big step closer to being
> merged upstream if you took others' feedback and showed more willingness
> to work through the outstanding issues.

Could you please let me know your opinion about merging dm-ioband
upstream? What do I have to do in order to merge dm-ioband?

Thanks,
Ryo Tsuruta
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/