linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 29/30] microblaze_mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:44:27 +0200
From:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.williams@...alogix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/30] microblaze_mmu_v1: stat.h MMU update

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>       long            st_size;        /* Size of file, in bytes.  */
>> Maybe unsigned? Make more sense to me that file size is not minus.
>> And for some types below.
> 
> st_size represents an off_t in user space, which is signed.
> Just over half the existing architectures use signed types
> for st_size, but for this (like Sam's suggestion for __u64),
> I don't think it matters either way.

OK. Is it mean that your structure is perfect? If yes, I'll recompile toolchain and do some more tests.

Michal

> 
> 	Arnd <><


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/