[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090428100023.GA18148@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:00:23 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
hpa@...icro.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: linker script: avoid ALIGN statements inside output sections
>
> Below is hpa's fix merged up by me on top of your cleanups. That
> merge-up is incomplete as we lose these fixlets.
>
> And in this form it's visible how we lose those cleanups you did -
> which werent really cleanups ... Please keep such side-effects apart
> from truly mechanic cleanups, whenever possible - it makes life
> really simpler.
The cleanup that you applied did NOT move any ALIGN() - or
at least not on purpose.
It was supposed to be a noop from a functionality point of view.
I have started to unify the the two vmlinux.lds files for
32 and 64 bit - and as part of that serie (yet to be published) you will
see individual commits where ALING() is moved and secitons
are reordered etc.
I do this in baby steps so we can track regressions using bisect.
The work is done on top of x86/kbuild and I will rebase as needed when
I have it ready.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists