[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090428104825.GA25347@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:48:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
hpa@...icro.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: linker script: avoid ALIGN statements
inside output sections
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> >
> > Below is hpa's fix merged up by me on top of your cleanups. That
> > merge-up is incomplete as we lose these fixlets.
> >
> > And in this form it's visible how we lose those cleanups you did -
> > which werent really cleanups ... Please keep such side-effects apart
> > from truly mechanic cleanups, whenever possible - it makes life
> > really simpler.
>
> The cleanup that you applied did NOT move any ALIGN() - or
> at least not on purpose.
> It was supposed to be a noop from a functionality point of view.
yeah - indeed - i mis-interpreted your statement.
> I have started to unify the the two vmlinux.lds files for
> 32 and 64 bit - and as part of that serie (yet to be published) you will
> see individual commits where ALING() is moved and secitons
> are reordered etc.
> I do this in baby steps so we can track regressions using bisect.
>
> The work is done on top of x86/kbuild and I will rebase as needed
> when I have it ready.
Cool :)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists