[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13990.1240928654@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:24:14 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, niv@...ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, kernel@...tstofly.org, matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v3 RCU: the bloatwatch edition
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> This patch is a version of RCU designed for (!SMP && EMBEDDED)
> provided as a proof of concept of a small-footprint RCU implementation.
> In particular, the implementation of synchronize_rcu() is extremely
> lightweight and high performance. It passes rcutorture testing in each
> of the four relevant configurations (combinations of NO_HZ and PREEMPT)
> on x86. This saves about 900 bytes compared to Classic RCU, and a
> couple kilobytes compared to Hierarchical RCU:
On FRV, CLASSIC_RCU:
text data bss dec hex filename
2616 184 0 2800 af0 kernel/rcuclassic.o
884 32 20 936 3a8 kernel/rcupdate.o
TREE_RCU:
3940 328 0 4268 10ac kernel/rcutree.o
884 32 20 936 3a8 kernel/rcupdate.o
TINY_RCU:
1152 32 0 1184 4a0 kernel/rcutiny.o
836 32 20 888 378 kernel/rcupdate.o
It works on my FRV board.
Possibly TINY_RCU could be shrunk a bit more by a judicious bit of inlining of
some of the very small functions.
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists