[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905011529.04774.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:29:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Remis Lima Baima <remis.developer@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/27] asm-generic: add legacy I/O header files
On Friday 01 May 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> Joining in late but its not at all highly PC specific. The same frequency
> is used for a whole pile of setups (Alpha etc). It's not well named but
> there are good sound reasons the PC chose 1193182 and while those reasons
> have long lapsed its a good frequency for other reasons nowdays.
>
> The clock isn't for the PIC either - its for the PIT (although its used
> to clock various other things).
>
> We actually have a define of PIT_TICK_RATE internal to the x86 port for
> those x86 cases that can use it.
How about this comment then:
/*
* CLOCK_TICK_RATE is traditionally the base frequency using the PC-style
* i8253 "PIT" timer. Architecture independent device drivers should not
* rely on this value.
* Any architecture that either has a real PC-style PIT, or does not have a
* fixed timer interval at all and just needs to provide some value here
* should just fall back to this default.
*/
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists