[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090501144037.5a5dc65f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:40:37 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Remis Lima Baima <remis.developer@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/27] asm-generic: add legacy I/O header files
> In that case, I still think it would be good to have it in asm-generic.
> Half the architectures define it in this way currently, and new architectures
> would still have to think about it before falling back on the default.
Only if they noticed it was even present in the generic includes. Why
would they notice - meaningless code would just compile perfectly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists