| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ac3eb2510905011459i6cbf1199ua0670b82097a0309@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 23:59:32 +0200 From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com, jblunck@...e.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver-core: devtmpfs - driver core maintained /dev tmpfs On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 21:26, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 May 2009 13:16:22 +0200 > Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 07:29, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: >> >> > dev->type->nodename() might have failed due to -ENOMEM, in which case >> > it seems wrong to assume that it returned NULL for <whatever reason you >> > thought it might want to return NULL>. >> > >> > It's all a bit confused. >> >> This logic is only for providing a custom name hint. Only a few >> devices need that at all. If the allocation fails, the default name >> will be used, not the custom name. > > But that's bad, isn't it? It means that the kernel will come up with > one name if the memory allocation succeeded, and a different name if > the allocation failed. Yeah, sure, it's bad. But I think we have pretty much lost anyway, if we run into oom at this stage. What should we do instead? If we, for some reason, can not get a possible custom name? Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists