linux-kernel - RE: "N" symbols and System.map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA39EF46B91@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 May 2009 15:39:23 -0700
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: RE: "N" symbols and System.map

> Are there other architectures which would suffer if N were included in
> System.map, or would that be a reasonable thing to do?

ia64 has no "N" symbols.  _end shows up as an "A" for me.

-Tony