[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2preso1wl.fsf@igel.home>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 01:10:18 +0200
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: "N" symbols and System.map
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> right now, we filter out symbols that nm tag N, meaning "debugging
> symbols", from System.map. However, at least on x86, the linker-generated
> symbol _end is tagged N, and in fact is the only N in the entire image.
>
> Are there other architectures which would suffer if N were included in
> System.map, or would that be a reasonable thing to do?
There should not be any N symbols unless you are using stabs debugging.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists