[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49FEC98E.4050906@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 14:55:10 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: compat ioctl32 for /dev/snapshot?
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> writes:
>
>> Is there any reason why 32-bit uswsusp &Friends does not work
>> on 64bits kernel?
>>
>> For one, 32bits s2disk produces the following when trying to
>> suspend:
>>
>> ioctl32(s2disk:4134): Unknown cmd fd(4) cmd(400c330d){t:'3';sz:12} arg(ff853554) on /dev/snapshot
>> ioctl32(s2disk:4134): Unknown cmd fd(4) cmd(4004330a){t:'3';sz:4} arg(00000805) on /dev/snapshot
>>
[]
> It's probably just that nobody has written the code yet. In general all
> missing compat_ioctls are bugs.
Oh well.
Is the following patch ok? I just pulled all the SNAPSHOT_* stuff from
include/linux/suspend_ioctls.h and added them into fs/compat_ioctl.c.
The ioctls are:
o argument-less (most of them are)
o have single loff_t argument (other ioctls with the same argument are
marked as COMPAT_IOCTL
o have single int argument - they's also marked as COMPAT_IOCTL,
o and one othem, SNAPSHOT_SET_SWAP_AREA, has argument pointing to
the following structure (include/linux/suspend_ioctls.h):
struct resume_swap_area {
loff_t offset;
u_int32_t dev;
} __attribute__((packed));
so I think it also does not need any translation layer.
I can't test it so far, because uswsusp tools are broken in mixed
32/64bit case in other places. But at least it compiles fine and
does not complain anymore.
I never touched this area before so I may be wrong... but if it's ok...
Signed-Off-By: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Thanks!
/mjt
View attachment "snapshot-compat-ioctl.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1001 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists