[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090506192035.GB21993@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:20:35 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hartleys@...ionengravers.com, mcrapet@...il.com,
fred99@...olina.rr.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Double check memmap is actually valid with a memmap
has unexpected holes
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:31:00PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:06:53PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > I think we also need to fix up show_mem().
>
> As it turns out, ARM has its own show_mem(). I don't see how, but ARM
> must not be using lib/show_mem.c even though it compiles it.
That happens because lib/show_mem.c is a library file, and since there
isn't an unresolved reference to show_mem in from within the object
files ld is asked to link, the version in the .a library won't be
brought in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists