[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A02EFD2.40707@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 07:27:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: 46 bit PAE support
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Yes, struct page is ~64 bytes, and 64*64 == 4096.
>
> Alas, it's not a problem: my suggestion wasnt to simulate 64 TB of
> RAM. My suggestion was to create a sparse physical memory map (in a
> virtual machine) that spreads ~1GB of RAM all around the 64 TB
> physical address space. That will test whether the kernel is able to
> map and work with such physical addresses. (which will cover most of
> the issues)
>
> A good look at /debug/x86/dump_pagetables with such a system booted
> up would be nice as well - to make sure every virtual memory range
> is in its proper area, and that there's enough free space around
> them.
>
We're working on simulating this at Intel. We should hopefully be able
to test this next week.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists