| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090508151044.GC29974@elte.hu> Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:10:44 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> Subject: Re: ftrace 2.6.30-rc4: possible circular locking dependency * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote: > > Hi Tetsuo, > > Thanks for the report. But we already have a fix for it. But the change is > a bit of design change, and it is one of those things that is hard to know > if we should push it up stream this late in the RCs. > > We probably should. But the change affects two different subsystems. It > affects ftrace as well as the module code. There's a bit of changes to the > module code (Rusty being the maintainer) where we would be more > comfortable if it goes via Rusty. > > Rusty and Ingo, > > What is the best way to get this change upstream? > > Reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/15/548 > > tip git SHA1: 93eb677d74a4f7d3edfb678c94f6c0544d9fbad2 Would be nice to have a non-conflicting version against latest -git - which Tetsuo could test as well, and which i could apply if the test is successful. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists