[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905081124350.28378@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:25:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: ftrace 2.6.30-rc4: possible circular locking dependency
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Tetsuo,
> >
> > Thanks for the report. But we already have a fix for it. But the change is
> > a bit of design change, and it is one of those things that is hard to know
> > if we should push it up stream this late in the RCs.
> >
> > We probably should. But the change affects two different subsystems. It
> > affects ftrace as well as the module code. There's a bit of changes to the
> > module code (Rusty being the maintainer) where we would be more
> > comfortable if it goes via Rusty.
> >
> > Rusty and Ingo,
> >
> > What is the best way to get this change upstream?
> >
> > Reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/15/548
> >
> > tip git SHA1: 93eb677d74a4f7d3edfb678c94f6c0544d9fbad2
>
> Would be nice to have a non-conflicting version against latest -git
> - which Tetsuo could test as well, and which i could apply if the
> test is successful.
OK, I'll write up a patch.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists