linux-kernel - Linux and LLVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5bd819b0905081228m4ee6472bhc3968b178f038b9c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 May 2009 21:28:32 +0200
From:	Grozdan <neutrino8@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Linux and LLVM

Hi,

First, I'd like to say that I'm not interested in any holy wars,
trolling, ego-boosters, or whatever, and basically want to ask a
simple question and get the views of the Linux developers on it, at
least from those who are interested in answering it or have time to do
so as I know that most kernel devs are very busy :)

Recently, FreeBSD has reported that it's slowly switching from GCC to
LLVM/CLANG for compilers. What are the thoughts of the Linux kernel
devs about this and do they things that it's a good idea to go in the
same direction as FreeBSD (switching over to LLVM)?

Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to this specific mailing list

Thanks :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/