linux-kernel - Re: Linux and LLVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A048AF4.1080205@garzik.org>
Date:	Fri, 08 May 2009 15:41:40 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Grozdan <neutrino8@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux and LLVM

Grozdan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> First, I'd like to say that I'm not interested in any holy wars,
> trolling, ego-boosters, or whatever, and basically want to ask a
> simple question and get the views of the Linux developers on it, at
> least from those who are interested in answering it or have time to do
> so as I know that most kernel devs are very busy :)
> 
> Recently, FreeBSD has reported that it's slowly switching from GCC to
> LLVM/CLANG for compilers. What are the thoughts of the Linux kernel
> devs about this and do they things that it's a good idea to go in the
> same direction as FreeBSD (switching over to LLVM)?

It is highly unlikely we will switch compilers away from gcc -- we have 
enough problems just supporting multiple gcc versions.

That said, you could join the effort to get LLVM to compile under the 
kernel.  Here is a meta-bug for that: 
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4068

It is a moot question until LLVM can actually build a bootable kernel :)

Regards,

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/