[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5bd819b0905081250k2095beb6r1aae22fcd82ac468@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 21:50:04 +0200
From: Grozdan <neutrino8@...il.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux and LLVM
2009/5/8 Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>:
> Grozdan wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> First, I'd like to say that I'm not interested in any holy wars,
>> trolling, ego-boosters, or whatever, and basically want to ask a
>> simple question and get the views of the Linux developers on it, at
>> least from those who are interested in answering it or have time to do
>> so as I know that most kernel devs are very busy :)
>>
>> Recently, FreeBSD has reported that it's slowly switching from GCC to
>> LLVM/CLANG for compilers. What are the thoughts of the Linux kernel
>> devs about this and do they things that it's a good idea to go in the
>> same direction as FreeBSD (switching over to LLVM)?
>
> It is highly unlikely we will switch compilers away from gcc -- we have
> enough problems just supporting multiple gcc versions.
>
> That said, you could join the effort to get LLVM to compile under the
> kernel. Here is a meta-bug for that:
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4068
>
> It is a moot question until LLVM can actually build a bootable kernel :)
Thanks for the quick answer! I was not aware that currently there's
lots of work until CLANG can compile a bootable Linux kernel. Thanks
for the link too. I'll dig through it
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists