[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090509100137.GC20941@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:01:37 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] tracing/mm: add page frame snapshot trace
* Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> 2) support concurrent object iterations
> For example, a huge 1TB memory space can be split up into 10
> segments which can be queried concurrently (with different options).
this should already be possible. If you lseek the trigger file, that
will be understood as an 'offset' by the patch, and then write a
(decimal) value into the file, that will be the count.
So it should already be possible to fork off nr_cpus helper threads,
one bound to each CPU, each triggering trace output of a separate
segment of the memory map - and each reading that CPU's
trace_pipe_raw file to recover the data - all in parallel.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists