[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090509102751.GA15726@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:27:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] tracing/mm: add page frame snapshot trace
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > 2) support concurrent object iterations
> > For example, a huge 1TB memory space can be split up into 10
> > segments which can be queried concurrently (with different options).
>
> this should already be possible. If you lseek the trigger file,
> that will be understood as an 'offset' by the patch, and then
> write a (decimal) value into the file, that will be the count.
>
> So it should already be possible to fork off nr_cpus helper
> threads, one bound to each CPU, each triggering trace output of a
> separate segment of the memory map - and each reading that CPU's
> trace_pipe_raw file to recover the data - all in parallel.
And note that trace_pipe_raw supports splice(), while
/proc/{kpageflags|kpagecount} does not, so the output side might
probably be a bit faster than the /proc method.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists