[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A0763A5.4050600@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 08:30:45 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/12] ide-atapi remove pc->buf
Hello, Bartlomiej.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Good question, how's about:
>
> Once tj/block-unify-sector-and-data_len is in block/for-2.6.31 and your tree
> is ready I will pull it into the separate branch. This branch can be then
> pulled into ide/for-next or into new ide/all branch (replacing ide/for-next
> in linux-next).
>
> This means that I'll have to synchronize merge window merges with Jens but
> this is needed already and shouldn't be a problem.
>
> If somebody [ Tejun/Jens: I'm talking to you :) ] has a better idea how to
> handle this please stand-up.
There needs to be a sync point anyway and there's one more patchset on
top of block-unify-sector-and-data_len involving ide changes (the
block-peek-fetch one), so if both get acked by Jens, it would be
easier to simply branch out from there. From there on, I don't expect
too much disruption to ide from further block layer changes, so things
should be okay.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists