[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511094056.GB4624@lenovo>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:40:57 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: read apic id if it is not acpi_lapic -v2
[Ingo Molnar - Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:26:55AM +0200]
|
| * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
|
| > @@ -1590,21 +1591,32 @@ void __init init_apic_mappings(void)
| > } else
| > apic_phys = mp_lapic_addr;
| >
| > - set_fixmap_nocache(FIX_APIC_BASE, apic_phys);
| > + /* lets check if we may to NOP'ify apic operations */
| > + if (!cpu_has_apic) {
| > + pr_info("APIC: disable apic facility\n");
| > + apic_disable();
| > + return;
| > + }
| > +
| > + /*
| > + * acpi lapic path already map that address in
| > + * acpi_register_lapic_address()
| > + */
| > apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "mapped APIC to %08lx (%08lx)\n",
| > APIC_BASE, apic_phys);
| > + if (acpi_lapic)
| > + return;
|
| why do we return here? We should sanity-check the APIC ID even if we
| come from ACPI.
|
| Ingo
|
I believe we already have it checked in acpi_register_lapic_address
so no need to do it twice. Or I miss something?
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists