lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-0719318fea31d54d13ed8ead7f4a277038bd75a2@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2009 12:33:28 GMT
From:	tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balajirrao@...il.com,
	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters

Commit-ID:  0719318fea31d54d13ed8ead7f4a277038bd75a2
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0719318fea31d54d13ed8ead7f4a277038bd75a2
Author:     KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 9 May 2009 19:14:58 +0900
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:21:32 +0200

sched: cpuacct: Use bigger percpu counter batch values for stats counters

percpu counters used to accumulate statistics in cpuacct controller use
the default batch value [max(2*nr_cpus, 32)] which can be too small for
archs that define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING. In such archs, a tick could result in
cputime updates in the range of thousands. As a result, cpuacct_update_stats()
would end up acquiring the percpu counter spinlock on every tick which
is not good for performance.

Let those architectures to have a bigger batch threshold so that percpu counter
spinlock isn't taken on every tick. This change doesn't affect the archs which
don't define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING and they continue to have the default
percpu counter batch value.

 v5:
 - move cpuacct_batch initialization into sched_init()

 v4:
  - rewrite patch description (thanks Bharata!)
  - append read_mostly to cpuacct_batch
  - cpuacct_batch is initialized by sched_init_debug()

 v3:
  - revert using percpu_counter_sum()

 v2:
  - use percpu_counter_sum() instead percpu_counter_read()

Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@...il.com>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090509191430.3AD5.A69D9226@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 kernel/sched.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 8908d19..beadb82 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -872,6 +872,8 @@ static __read_mostly int scheduler_running;
  */
 int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime = 950000;
 
+static __read_mostly s32 cpuacct_batch;
+
 static inline u64 global_rt_period(void)
 {
 	return (u64)sysctl_sched_rt_period * NSEC_PER_USEC;
@@ -9181,6 +9183,8 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 	alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map);
 #endif /* SMP */
 
+	cpuacct_batch = jiffies_to_cputime(percpu_counter_batch);
+
 	scheduler_running = 1;
 }
 
@@ -10354,7 +10358,8 @@ static void cpuacct_update_stats(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	ca = task_ca(tsk);
 
 	do {
-		percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val);
+		__percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val, cpuacct_batch);
+
 		ca = ca->parent;
 	} while (ca);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ