linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ata: libata depends on HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200905121505.46063.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2009 15:05:45 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata depends on HAS_DMA

On Tuesday 12 May 2009, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DMA
>         ap->prd = dmam_alloc_coherent(dev, ATA_PRD_TBL_SZ, &ap->prd_dma,
>                                       GFP_KERNEL);
> +#else
> +       ap->prd = devres_alloc(dev, ATA_PRD_TBL_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAS_DMA */
>         if (!ap->prd)
>                 return -ENOMEM;

this should have been devm_kzalloc, not devres_alloc.

	Arnd <><