[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A0974FA.9090501@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:09:14 +0200
From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Li Wei <W.Li@....COM>,
Michael Ellerman <michaele@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>>> +/* __gcov_init is called by gcc-generated constructor code for each object
>>>> + * file compiled with -fprofile-arcs. */
[...]
> It isnt about the amount of comments, it is about the plain (and
> simple to rectify) fact that the above two-lines comment is
> inconsistent with other kernel code.
Ok, I misunderstood when I replied. The updated patch set should contain
the correct changes though.
>>>> $(asflags-y) $(AFLAGS_$(basetarget).o)
>>>> _cpp_flags = $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(cppflags-y) $(CPPFLAGS_$(@F))
>>>> +# Enable gcov profiling flags for a file, directory or for all
>>>> files depending
>>>> +# on variables GCOV_PROFILE_obj.o, GCOV_PROFILE and CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
>>>> +# (in this order)
>>>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL),y)
>>> Please try to use winged comments in makefiles too.
>> What do you mean by winged comments?
>
> This:
>
> /*
> * Comment .....
> * ...... goes here:
> */
>
> Is called a winged comment. Its makefile equivalent is:
Ok. Though google disagrees on that definition (see
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/W/winged-comments.html).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists