[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A099013.6040708@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:04:51 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
eswierk@...stanetworks.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:irq/numa] x86: read apic ID in the !acpi_lapic case
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> [Ingo Molnar - Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:22:05PM +0200]
>> |
>> | this build bug is still unfixed:
>> |
>> | drivers/pci/hotplug/ibmphp_core.c:165: error: expected identifier before ‘&’ token
>> | drivers/pci/hotplug/ibmphp_core.c:166: error: too few arguments to function ‘IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector’
>> |
>> | Ingo
>> |
>>
>> Grrr... this line looks really suspicious inideed
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>> (*cur_slot)->irq[i] = IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector((int) (*cur_slot)->bus,
>> ---> (int) (*cur_slot)->device, i.
>> &ioapic, &ioapic_pin,
>> &triggering, &polarity);
>>
>> but it's _not_ 'cause of this commit, since
>> we didn't even touch this file :) The point
>> symbol should be changed to comma. Just a
>> misprint I believe. Appened patch should do
>> the trick.
>
> Yinghai touched it:
>
> e20c06f: x86/pci: add 4 more return parameters to IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector()
>
i put the fix in
[PATCH] x86: introduce io_apic_irq_attr -v2
<4A08ACD3.2070401@...nel.org>
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists