linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] swim3: use blk_end_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A0994FF.1030909@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2009 00:25:51 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC:	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] swim3: use blk_end_request_all()

Hello,

FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This is against for-2.6.31 branch in the block tree.
> 
> Tejun, don't we need to use blk_end_request_all() when we hit the
> maximum retry count in swim3_interrupt? Looks like we can't handle a
> request properly if we doesn't complete the request there.

Ummm.... why so?  Can you elaborate the bug scenario a bit?  I was
trying to keep the original behavior whereever possible.

> There are some other places to use blk_end_request_all if we need to.

There are some other places where end_request_all can be used but I
hope there isn't any place where we should but aren't.  :-)

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/