[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A099562.7020805@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:27:30 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swim3: use blk_end_request instead of blk_update_request
Hello,
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> blk_update_request() was meant for request-based-multi-path, and not for swim3
> please see:
> 32fab448 block: add request update interface
>
> CC: Kiyoshi Ueda<k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
>
> I think Tejun Heo was just using that in some recent block layer,
> transformation.
> Tejun?
Yeah, conversion was easy that way. I think it's sane to have
blk_update_request() exported as long as request internal tinkering is
kept in block layer proper.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists