[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090512181358.GC19143@aftab>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:13:58 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c adding extended_cpuid_level for
/proc/cpuinfo
Hi,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:40:40AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>>
> >> why we need cpuid_level ?
> >
> > It is already visible in userspace. I think you've got an answer to a
> > very similar question already:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124206571628464
> >
>
> extended_cpuid_level should be motivated, but probably does make sense.
I still fail to see the need for adding that to /proc/cpuinfo,
especially if you can do the whole exercise from userspace. But I'm sure
you have a good example.
> It hardly "completes" /proc/cpuinfo; especially if you consider that
> there are at least three additional ranges in wide use (two used by a
> single vendor only, and the third by virtualization software.)
I think both vendors use the two ranges :-o).
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
(OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists