[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A09C444.9070809@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 11:47:32 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
CC: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c adding extended_cpuid_level for
/proc/cpuinfo
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
>> It hardly "completes" /proc/cpuinfo; especially if you consider that
>> there are at least three additional ranges in wide use (two used by a
>> single vendor only, and the third by virtualization software.)
>
> I think both vendors use the two ranges :-o).
>
No, I'm taking about the 0x8086xxxx and 0xC000xxxx used by two other
vendors (neither of which you and I work for, and at least one of which
is defunct.)
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists