linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c adding extended_cpuid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ea470500905121249i5fddf318lde5377d3d438854a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2009 21:49:45 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c adding extended_cpuid_level for 
	/proc/cpuinfo

Hi,

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>
>>>  It hardly "completes" /proc/cpuinfo; especially if you consider that
>>> there are at least three additional ranges in wide use (two used by a
>>> single vendor only, and the third by virtualization software.)
>>
>> I think both vendors use the two ranges :-o).
>>
>
> No, I'm taking about the 0x8086xxxx and 0xC000xxxx used by two other
> vendors (neither of which you and I work for, and at least one of which
> is defunct.)

Ah, yes. Gotcha.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/