[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090512043522.GA17079@localhost>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 12:35:22 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"elladan@...imo.com" <elladan@...imo.com>,
"npiggin@...e.de" <npiggin@...e.de>,
"cl@...ux-foundation.org" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: make mapped executable pages the first
class citizen
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:50:58AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Now. How do we know that this patch improves Linux?
>
> Hmm, it seems hard to get measurable performance numbers.
>
> But we know that the running executable code is precious and shall be
> protected, and the patch protects them in this way:
>
> before patch: will be reclaimed if not referenced in I
> after patch: will be reclaimed if not referenced in I+A
s/will/may/, to be more exact.
> where
> A = time to fully scan the active file LRU
> I = time to fully scan the inactive file LRU
>
> Note that normally A >> I.
>
> Therefore this patch greatly prolongs the in-cache time of executable code,
> when there are moderate memory pressures.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists