[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242109389.11251.310.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:23:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"elladan@...imo.com" <elladan@...imo.com>,
"npiggin@...e.de" <npiggin@...e.de>,
"cl@...ux-foundation.org" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: report vm_flags in page_referenced()
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 10:51 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> @@ -406,6 +408,7 @@ static int page_referenced_anon(struct p
> if (mem_cont && !mm_match_cgroup(vma->vm_mm, mem_cont))
> continue;
> referenced += page_referenced_one(page, vma, &mapcount);
> + *vm_flags |= vma->vm_flags;
> if (!mapcount)
> break;
> }
Shouldn't that read:
if (page_referenced_on(page, vma, &mapcount)) {
referenced++;
*vm_flags |= vma->vm_flags;
}
So that we only add the vma-flags of those vmas that actually have a
young bit set?
In which case it'd be more at home in page_referenced_one():
@@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ out_unmap:
(*mapcount)--;
pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
out:
+ if (referenced)
+ *vm_flags |= vma->vm_flags;
return referenced;
}
Otherwise seems like a nice series, but please post the next version in
a new thread, this one is getting a bit unwieldy ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists