[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090513214551.739757fd@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 21:45:51 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>
To: Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
"David Brownell" <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc_spi: do propper retry managment in the block layer
On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:45:30 +0200
Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de> wrote:
>
> I checked the drivers sourcecode and found that most drivers are using EINVAL
> for non-recoverable parameter errors.
>
> The only driver which uses EINVAL for errors which might result from
> transmission failures is mmc_spi.
>
> So I think it would be OK to use another error code in mmc_spi for these
> cases:
>
> * EILSEQ Basic format problem with the received or sent data
> * (e.g. CRC check failed, incorrect opcode in response
> * or bad end bit)
>
> Would you accept a patch to report another error code in mmc_spi?
>
EILSEQ seems correct for SPI bit errors, so I'd gladly accept such a
patch, yes. :)
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists