[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200905132219.19216@centrum.cz>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:19:25 +0200
From: <trekker.dk@...trum.cz>
To: <pavel@....cz>
Cc: <tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net>,
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
______________________________________________________________
> Od: pavel@....cz
> Komu: trekker.dk@...trum.cz
> CC: tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Datum: 11.05.2009 23:24
> Předmět: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
>
>Hi!
>
>> >> >To summarise disadvantages:
>> >> >
>> >> >- only core has 8000 LoC
>> >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
>> >> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
>> >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
>> >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
>> >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
>> >>
>> >
>> >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?
>>
>> Regarding hardware -
>>
>> 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2
>> 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT
>> 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II, AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT
>> (binary driver for video card every time)
>
>Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should
>be easy to test with init=/bin/bash.
> Pavel
Yes, that works - and after complete boot w/o loading binary driver resume works too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists