[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A0C1571.2020106@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:58:25 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case
of no swap space V2
Minchan Kim wrote:
> Now shrink_active_list is called several places.
> But if we don't have a swap space, we can't reclaim anon pages.
If swap space has run out, get_scan_ratio() will return
0 for the anon scan ratio, meaning we do not scan the
anon lists.
> So, we don't need deactivating anon pages in anon lru list.
If we are close to running out of swap space, with
swapins freeing up swap space on a regular basis,
I believe we do want to do aging on the active
pages, just so we can pick a decent page to swap
out next time swap space becomes available.
> +static int can_reclaim_anon(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
> +{
> + return (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc) && nr_swap_pages <= 0);
> +}
> +
This function name is misleading, because when we do have
swap space available but inactive_anon_is_low is false,
we still want to reclaim inactive anon pages!
What problem did you encounter that you think this patch
solves?
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists