linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case of no swap space V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28c262360905140609y580b6835m759dee08f08a26ab@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2009 22:09:03 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case 
	of no swap space V2

HI, Rik

Thanks for careful review. :)

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> Minchan Kim wrote:
>
>> Now shrink_active_list is called several places.
>> But if we don't have a swap space, we can't reclaim anon pages.
>
> If swap space has run out, get_scan_ratio() will return
> 0 for the anon scan ratio, meaning we do not scan the
> anon lists.

I think get_scan_ration can't prevent scanning of anon pages in no
swap system(like embedded system).
That's because in shrink_zone, you add following as

        /*
         * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
         * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
         */
        if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
                shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0);

>> So, we don't need deactivating anon pages in anon lru list.
>
> If we are close to running out of swap space, with
> swapins freeing up swap space on a regular basis,
> I believe we do want to do aging on the active
> pages, just so we can pick a decent page to swap
> out next time swap space becomes available.

I agree your opinion.

>> +static int can_reclaim_anon(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
>> +{
>> +       return (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc) && nr_swap_pages <= 0);
>> +}
>> +
>
> This function name is misleading, because when we do have
> swap space available but inactive_anon_is_low is false,
> we still want to reclaim inactive anon pages!

Indeed. I will rename it.

> What problem did you encounter that you think this patch
> solves?

I thought In embedded system most products don't have swap space.
In such environment, We don't need anon lru list.
I think even scanning of anon list is much bad


> --
> All rights reversed.
>



-- 
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/