[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0905140727j5ba02b07t94826f57dd99839c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:27:00 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case
of no swap space V3
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 2f9d555..621708f 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
> * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
> * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
> */
> - if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
> + if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc) && nr_swap_pages > 0)
> shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0);
if (nr_swap_pages > 0 && inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
is better?
compiler can't swap evaluate order around &&.
then,
if ( 0 && inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
and
if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc) && 0)
are different.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists