[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44c63dc40905140739n271d3d2w2e0cc364c0012d71@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:39:49 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <barrioskmc@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case
of no swap space V3
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:27 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> index 2f9d555..621708f 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
>> * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
>> * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
>> */
>> - if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
>> + if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc) && nr_swap_pages > 0)
>> shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0);
>
>
> if (nr_swap_pages > 0 && inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
>
> is better?
> compiler can't swap evaluate order around &&.
If GCC optimizes away that branch with CONFIG_SWAP=n as Rik mentioned,
we don't have a concern.
--
Thanks,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists