[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0905140754v39bbe5efv16b01fe4939c6814@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:54:07 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <barrioskmc@...il.com>
Cc: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case
of no swap space V3
2009/5/14 Minchan Kim <barrioskmc@...il.com>:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:27 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> index 2f9d555..621708f 100644
>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
>>> * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
>>> * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
>>> */
>>> - if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
>>> + if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc) && nr_swap_pages > 0)
>>> shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0);
>>
>>
>> if (nr_swap_pages > 0 && inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
>>
>> is better?
>> compiler can't swap evaluate order around &&.
>
> If GCC optimizes away that branch with CONFIG_SWAP=n as Rik mentioned,
> we don't have a concern.
ok. I ack this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists